On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Harald Barth wrote: > Looks like the pioctl can return a list of sysnames and the first 4 > bytes in the blob is the number of sysnames. Then it looks like the > print format if the pioctl returns a list of sysnames is > > Current sysname list is 'foo' 'bar' 'baz' > > as opposed to > > Current sysname is 'foo'
yes. > 1) Is it a good idea to change the number of words returned by a command > like this? (I think NO). in which way would you prefer it be changed? ;-) > 2) Shouldn't there be another command to request a list (like fs sysnamelist)? perhaps so, probably using a separate pioctl in implementation- or common- space > 3) Is the sysnamelist feature used anywhere or is it safe to say that that > outputformat is a bad idea and change it? it's used by people who are using sysname lists. i don't understand this question -D _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
