On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Neulinger, Nathan wrote: > Is it a case of it not compiling, or is there some other underlying reason > it is not enabled? > > Would be nice to not have to rely on the ugly hacks (which tend to break > when you forget about them and do kernel/afs updates) to go and clean up the > stray unused pags+tokens.
The necessary code to figure out if a pag is still "occupied" by processes doesn't always work correctly; On some platforms it's worse than others; In some cases things have changed and it's historical but no one's verified it's "sane" and I'm not sure how to reliably test such programmatically. -D _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
