On 18 Jan 2002, Derek Atkins wrote: > Derrick, > > Have you considered changing over to using bitkeeper instead of CVS? > Then individual developers could have their own local repositories and > make local deltas, and then they could set up their changesets to > openafs-gatekeepers. When you apply a changeset users could pull it > down into their own repositories. > > It would give developers the chance to make local "commits" for change > history during development without requiring access to the global > repository.
At minimum, there are licensing issues with BitKeeper to consider; I assume we also need to re-export to a CVS tree to continue to provide anoncvs. -D _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
