"split" is interpreted by rxgen to produce two client interface
routines:
StartRXAFS_StoreData and EndRXAFS_StoreData.

The whole RPC looks then like

StartRXAFS_StoreData();
rx_write();
...
rx_write();
EndRXAFS_StoreData();

That means the data of the file are transfered without additional
xdr-overhead just as a byte-stream.

Hartmut




"Neulinger, Nathan" wrote:
> 
> When I see:
> 
> StoreData(
>   IN  AFSFid *Fid,
>   AFSStoreStatus *InStatus,
>   afs_uint32 Pos,
>   afs_uint32 Length,
>   afs_uint32 FileLength,
>   OUT AFSFetchStatus *OutStatus,
>   AFSVolSync *Sync
> ) split = 133;
> 
> What is the split indicating? I'm trying to improve the afs dissection in
> ethereal. It looks like the initial packet has the in values, but 2nd and
> further packets do not have any of those values. Except, there is no
> reference in that function description to the actual 'data' that is being
> stored. Is that what split indicates? That there is additional blob data
> tacked onto the end of the request, possibly multiple packets long?
> 
> -- Nathan
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Nathan Neulinger                       EMail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> University of Missouri - Rolla         Phone: (573) 341-4841
> Computing Services                       Fax: (573) 341-4216
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hartmut Reuter                           e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                           phone +49-89-3299-1328
RZG (Rechenzentrum Garching)               fax   +49-89-3299-1301 
Computing Center of the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG) and the
Institut fuer Plasmaphysik (IPP)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to