Right.
Thanks. On Tuesday 29 January 2002 11:31 am, Derek Atkins wrote: > Matt Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Also, can someone explain what is meant by the following? > > > > Nickolai Zeldovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Unfortunately, this has the side effect of artificially increasing the > > > system load to ~4 when AFS is idle, because the background daemons > > > block waiting for requests. > > > > Is Nickolai is right on this one? Tasks with a state of > > TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE do not appear to increase the system load. If they > > did, you'd already see an increase of 4 as the daemon syscalls currently > > spend most of their time in interruptable_sleep_on() (even without > > Nickolai's patch). Basically, I don't see how Nickolai's patch would > > change system load. > > This was in reference to using a non-interruptible sleep, which does > have the affect of increasing the load. > > -derek -- Matt Peterson Sr. Software Engineer Caldera, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
