On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Neulinger, Nathan wrote: > Sounds great to me! Standard prototypes or using _P()? > > Worst case scenario can hardwire _P() to blank when doing kernel > compiles on affected systems.
If there are no systems which need _P() now there's not much point in using it; We're not likely to port to old crufty systems, we already have ports for all of them. The only port I can't check is HPUX 11. > What about ANSI v. K&R on the routines themselves? presumably ansi, if we can do it safely. K&R is dead. > I'll definately dig in on this when you're ready to move on it, cause > it's the type of cleanup/rework stuff I usually enjoy working on. no time like the present. let's figure out what we're doing and do it. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
