>doesn't do anything if there's enough cache space. I'm curious if >you actually observed lower write performance?
nothing i would call significant. >Minor nit: it doesn't look like code2 is really necessary; seems >like using code for afs_DoPartialWrite's return value should just >work. Actually, on closer inspection, you actually have two code2's, >with the one being used to store the value overshadowing the one that >is used to check the value later on :-) oops. that one code2 shouldnt be hanging around :) i had this after the trace originally and needed the extra code2. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
