What changes does it take to compile AIX 4.3.3 binaries with sysname rs_aix43 rather than rs_aix42 ?
With early versions of IBM AFS 3.6, I used to patch the afs.ext, afs.ext.iauth, and sys binaries to use rs_aix43 as my sysname. Since patch level 2.32, IBM AFS 3.6 has come with rs_aix43 already compiled in. I have tried to build src/config/Makefile.rs_aix43.in src/config/param.rs_aix43.h src/config/param.rs_aix43_usr.h with some obvious modifications versus their rs_aix42 counterparts. However, trying to compile, I get error messages because libodm.a, libcfg.a, and also some include files aren't found. If I compile for sysname rs_aix42, everything works fine (having applied some patches posted here earlier, of course). I can still patch the afs.ext, afs.ext.iauth, and sys binaries, but that looks like an ugly hack. I know I can also use 'fs sysname', but it would just be so much more convenient to come up with the proper sysname right away. -- Michael Niksch /Zurich/IBM @ IBMCH IBM Zurich Research Laboratory [EMAIL PROTECTED] Saeumerstrasse 4 http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~nik/ CH-8803 Rueschlikon / Switzerland P: +41-1-724-8913 F: +41-1-724-8080 _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
