On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, David Botsch wrote: > I guess the problem I have with this at the moment is that it is > equivalent to saying on a redhat system, make install won't put > everything in the right place, but if you use this script to make an > rpm, then things will work.
Sure, tempered by: > On a related note, there are two ways to do things on OS X. The OS X > way or the UNIX way. The install for 10.1 was a mixture of both (ie the this problem. This is more or less the difference between the OpenAFS "Darwin" tarballs and the MacOS X packages. My opinion is underinformed but it's not clear to me that non-package installs for MacOS X are even as common as on RedHat systems. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
