On 16 Oct 2002, Nathan Neulinger wrote:

> Not sure it buys us much.
>
> We'd be adding a whole bunch of .s files, but still have to have the
> special targets in makefile, since compiled differently.
>
> I guess it would simplify process.s/process.c some.

yup

> Is inline assembly universally available? I wonder if we could make them
> all process.SYSNAME.c? Then should be able to make a single rule for
> compiling all of the pieces.

I don't think all the compilers we use support inline assembly.

_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to