Oh, he merged in that crap? Damn. It's a read-only, no-authentication, no-vlserver-lookup AFS client. What's the point?
-derek Matthew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:36:40AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > > Why would Red Hat specifically care about OpenAFS? In particular, why > > would they care about making it fail to work? > > I'm not advocating a conspiracy theory, but it's worth noting that Linus > recently merged a lightweight kernel-based AFS client written by someone > @redhat into the 2.5 kernel. So in a sense, someone there cares, but I > highly doubt they would spitefully do anything to break OpenAFS. > > -- > Matthew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.mattdm.org/> > Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
