Matthew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's got grandiose plans for getting better. In any case, I can > definitely see a place for a lightweight read-only client -- for most of > our users, that's all they do.
Certainly not ours. An unauthenticated client or a client without write access strikes me as practically worthless. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
