That would work. 

-- Nathan

------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan Neulinger                       EMail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Missouri - Rolla         Phone: (573) 341-4841
Computing Services                       Fax: (573) 341-4216


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derrick J Brashear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS-devel] shortcoming with current process 
> hiding/etc. for afsd on linux (and maybe others)
> 
> 
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Neulinger, Nathan wrote:
> 
> > With the changes that went in a while back to have afsd hide it's
> > arguments/change to [afsd], one shortcoming is that there 
> now does not
> 
> It's not really "hide arguments" so much as "that's not the 
> process you
> forked"
> 
> > appear to be any way to tell what options afsd is currently running
> > with. 
> > 
> > It might be nice to resolve this somehow. Maybe an 'fs getafsparms'
> > pioctl?
> 
> How about a file in /proc?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
> 
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to