On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Jim Rees wrote: > Expanding tabs is a possibility, but I'm not convinced it's necessary. It > would require changes in the way we do things. In particular, for me at > least, "cvs commit" would have to do the expansion, because not all the code > I check in comes from my editor, and my normal sanity checks (cvs diff) > won't catch tabs. Maybe this could be done on the cvs server? Anyway, it > would be a change from what we do now, and I would want to hear a compelling > reason to change.
Talked about this at dinner last night. If you do this, after committing, your file should still be state M, because it won't match the server. > The issue of indentation is, or should be, separate from that of tabs. I I agree. And in reference to your last comment, these are GNU indent options _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
