On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Matthew A. Bacchi wrote: > Is there currently any documentation for the OpenAFS codebase, or > possibly any interest in developing this? The source tree is daunting
You mean code reference as opposed to API reference? The former, no. The latter, out of date. > I have been using a source documentation tool called doxygen with some > small projects, and think it could be useful here. I've already run > it against the openafs-1.2.7 release, just to see how it works. It > basically provides a map of the tree, with cross references of > functions, headers, etc. But, to make full use of doxygen's > capabilities, commentary would need to be embedded into the source > itself, sorta like JavaDoc, obviously this could be expensive on a > project of this size. Perhaps there's some other option such that the code doesn't get all smeared up with the documentation? _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
