>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Alf Wachsmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
>
>is there already an "official" sysname assigned to Solaris 10?

No - not at this time.

---
frankB

>The current scheme is not easily extended:
>sun4x_57, sun4x_58, sun4x_59 -> sun4x_510? or sun4x_10?
>
>The same problem for x86/Solaris:
>sunx86_57, sunx86_58, sunx86_59 -> sunx86_510??
>
>Thanks,
>           Alf.
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Alf Wachsmann                       | e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  SLAC Computing Service              | Phone:  +1-650-926-4802
>  2575 Sand Hill Road, M/S 97         | FAX:    +1-650-926-3329
>  Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA           | Office: Bldg. 50/323
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>                http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~alfw (PGP)
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>_______________________________________________
>OpenAFS-devel mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

---
frankB

----------------------------------------------------------
Frank Batschulat                 Solaris Filesystems Group 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to