On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 12:49, Ray Link wrote: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Jim Rees wrote: > > PAM is only in the portable version of sshd, not the OpenBSD version. Maybe > > that's the difference. Or maybe theo has less control over the portable > > version. > > (read: If it didn't do PAM, no one would use it.)
I'm pretty sure that the OpenBSD/OpenSSH folks don't do anything other than host the portable version of OpenSSH. And yes, they strongly disapprove of both dlopen() and PAM. Given that, you might have better luck talking to the folks who maintain openssh-portable. -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] [EMAIL PROTECTED] system administrator [WAY too many hats] [EMAIL PROTECTED] electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon univ. KF8NH _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
