On Tuesday, May 11, 2004 00:49:26 -0400 Matthew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 07:02:26PM -0400, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:> Putting the PAG in the supplementary group list, though unavoidable, > was and is no less broken. True. But it's not terribly invasive and works pretty much everywhere.
Except for the part where it breaks Unix security.....
Can you be a bit more specific? What does it break? _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
