That sounds a lot like some of the patches that were already written did. Didn't do much good then either.
-- Nathan ------------------------------------------------------------ Nathan Neulinger EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-6679 UMR Information Technology Fax: (573) 341-4216 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete Zaitcev > Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 12:51 PM > To: Garrett Wollman > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Re: [OpenAFS] 2.6 kernel support > anytime soon? Workarounds? > > On Mon, 10 May 2004 13:47:32 -0400 (EDT) > Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > <<On Mon, 10 May 2004 13:25:05 -0400, "chas williams > (contractor)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > i imagine this would be violating the spirit of > export_symbol_gpl(). > > > > On the other hand, you could write a shim layer that implements a > > cross-platform API for security-label management. Then it > could also > > be made to work under FreeBSD as well, and the GPL weenies wouldn't > > have a leg to stand on. > > Send me patches when you're done, I'll have a look. > > -- Pete > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel > > _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
