In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Jeffrey Hutzelman writes: >Based on the patches Rainer has already sent on the REGPARM issue, my >understanding is that the problem is at least in part a failure on our part >to actually have argument types match between definitions and references of >our own functions. Now, why this only matters with CONFIG_REGPARM I don't >know.
it seems like some of the afs code isnt building with the regparm abi. the new build scheme seemed to work for me so i didnt examine it closely. >can't see any good reason for it. Perhaps someone thought it was too hard >to call groups_alloc(0) in another place. Wait... didn't you write the >AFS_LINUX26_ENV case to begin with? yep. at one point i didnt know the right way to represent an empty list of groups. now i do. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
