Matthew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also along those lines -- do you see an advantage of having a separate
> openafs-kernel subpackage? Why not just include that in -client?
Yes, there's an advantage. Indeed, my plan for the "official"
openafs-1.4 RPMS is to have separate openafs-kernel RPMS for each
kernel version.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
