On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 10:28:03AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 09:00:59AM -0500, Derrick J Brashear wrote: > > >Secondly, I know this is a rather drastic proposal, but is it time to > > >consider splitting the cache manager out of individual filesystem clients? > > It seems like Arla would probably have a better model for us all to follow > > if we did so. > > Or on Linux, something based on FUSE, which is apparently now getting > merged. i played with fuse and it does some rather croo-joze inode cacheing inside the kernel, and maintains a mapping of the inodes on your behalf so that the userspace program doesn't have to worry about inodes.
lufs on the other hand gleefully lets _you_ manage the inodes in userspace *cheerful* which of course if you get _wrong_... anyway... l. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
