--On Monday, February 21, 2005 09:42:38 -0500 Steve Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # 01: > "extend the vos examine command with the parameters -server > -partition to do a bulk vos examine for a server or for a server > specific partition ." > > "bulk" means here multiple volume listing (textual). 'vos listvol -long' already does this, for the most part. It doesn't print the vldb information, but the vldb information isn't really interesting when you are listing an entire partition. See also the -format option if you want machine readable output. >#02 > "an additional "flag" inside VLDB where we update a counter each time a > file within a specific volume was updated (needed to query volumes which > are worth to backup) which can be explored with vos examine and can be > reseted to zero with the vos setfield command (and over the api)" This is a reasonable idea, but is there any reason that you cannot use the volume's update timestamp to decide if the volume should be backed up? Are you actually trying to prioritize backups based on activity or do you just want to exclude those volumes that have not been changed?
p7scRJSZsY2Zx.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
