On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:13:07AM -0500, Ken Hornstein wrote: > >Can someone please examine this and ideally apply it to CVS? (or, at > >least parts of it?) > > I'd prefer no one change around the aklog bits just yet, as they're > still in a semi-broken state (I have changes to check in which would > conflict with some of the things in this patch). E.g., we might import > libkafs and simply not link against the AFS libraries.
I was thinking that libkafs might make it a lot cleaner.. Can you either check those changes in, or send me a copy? Also, is my first pass at a Makefile.in anywhere near reasonable? Should we be checking for heimdal vs MIT in configure? I almost had that patch working on heimdal on linux as well.. it spat out some error, but did actually get me tokens. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
