On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 10:40:48PM -0500, Kyle Moffett wrote: > On Mar 13, 2005, at 22:20, Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > >I'm kinda stumped as to why I can get 50MB/sec via NFS to the /vicepa > >partition, but through AFS, I'm only getting about 5. (I've tried both > >openafs and the 2.6.11 in-kernel AFS). > > One other thing to think about, OpenAFS does data encryption, so if your > server is already CPU-bound for some reason, that will only make it > worse. > > Cheers, > Kyle Moffett
I'm not using data encryption.. (fs getcrypt reports 'clear'). CPU utilization is around 5% utilization on the server. I just switched to a 100mb cache, (previously it was 1GB), and ran afsd with "afsd -memcache -chunksize 16", and now I'm getting a better, but not optimal throughput of around 25MB/sec. (Out of curiosity, what cache sizes do people generally run at?) _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
