On Thursday, March 17, 2005 09:52:00 PM -0500 Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Neulinger, Nathan wrote:
Client and server are both running builds from within the past few months.
-bash-2.05b# /usr/afsws/bin/fs checks These servers unavailable due to network or server problems: afs-fs1.cc.umr.edu afs-fs17.cc.umr.edu afs-fs7.cc.umr.edu
I would have suggested it was the bug Tom Keiser sent us a patch for in 1.3.79 but...
In a network trace, a few of the servers are sending back rx abort packets.
This suggests otherwise. Looking at your tcpdump output I think you might have more than one problem, possibly one which is this: http://www.openafs.org/cgi-bin/wdelta/STABLE14-fix-multirx-checkservers-2 0050216 (explaining why valid replies are seemingly ignored)
14:42:01.771456 afs-fs1.cc.umr.edu.afs3-fileserver > sysinst.cc.umr.edu.afs3-callback: rx abort (32) 14:42:01.774793 afs-fs7.cc.umr.edu.afs3-fileserver > sysinst.cc.umr.edu.afs3-callback: rx abort (32)
afs-fs7.cc.umr.edu.afs3-fileserver: rx data fs call get-time (32) 14:42:04.858423 sysinst.cc.umr.edu.afs3-callback > afs-fs1.cc.umr.edu.afs3-fileserver: rx data fs call get-time (32) 14:42:05.321829 afs-fs1.cc.umr.edu.afs3-fileserver > sysinst.cc.umr.edu.afs3-callback: rx abort (32) 14:42:05.835009 afs-fs7.cc.umr.edu.afs3-fileserver > sysinst.cc.umr.edu.afs3-callback: rx abort (32)
And this is something else. Can I see raw tcpdump output? I want to look more clossely at the aborts.
By "raw", I assume Derrick means as produced by 'tcpdump -s 1500 -x'. Which would indeed be interesting.
-- Jeff _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
