On Friday, March 18, 2005 11:37:43 AM -0500 Chaskiel M Grundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

--On Friday, March 18, 2005 10:04:52 AM -0500 Derrick J Brashear
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

The question is how verbose (if at all) we want to keep it. Some
verbosity is not necessarily a bad thing.
This particular bit of verbosity isn't very interesting. it's not a
progress indicator for a slow operation (or at least, it shouldn't be in
any normal case), and the only information it really adds is the total
number of inodes in the volume group, which I don't see as being
interesting. Salvagelogs are hard enough to read as it is without adding
more stuff that has little semantic value.

I agree. It was debugging code, and served its purpose. Rip it out. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to