Dean Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not disputing the way that AFS works internally. The point is that > it works wrongly. (though I think perhaps the example refutes the point > that the mode is somehow special) The commands I listed are not > unreasonable for users (and programs) to execute. '#' and '%' are valid > characters for filenames, so they are valid to have in targets for > symlinks. They just happen to be unusual because # and % have special > meanings in several shells.
> If mount points were a special type of inode, then it would always work > correctly, since the only way to create such an inode would be through > the fs command. I don't think this is big change, work-wise. Jeffrey already explained a course of action to address your problem that's much simpler than the one that you're proposing. Why are you still talking about new inode types? -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
