Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> to write shared library rules by hand, but if I do that, I'll be able >> to give you gcc for Solaris and Linux and then everyone else will be on >> their own. libtool would cover more platforms by far out of the box. >> >> It also has the advantage of taking care of the LD_RUN_PATH mess. > So, those dest tarballs we distribute: where are they getting installed? > Are you sure? Really? I don't believe you. So why is your LD_RUN_PATH > right for everyone? You don't want to use LD_RUN_PATH for relocatable tarballs, of course. There are some parts of the mess that can't be solved. If you're doing a more "traditional" install on a system where Autoconf can know where the destination location is, though, libtool deals reasonably well with making sure the binaries can find the shared libraries. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
