On Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:40:57 AM -0400 Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brett:
A better way to have handled this would have been for you to post the patch on a web server and then list the URL in an e-mail to the list. For a number of reasons it is preferred not to post 131K patches to a discussion list.
(1) the mail is simply too large
mea culpa. The list software normally would not have allowed such a large post without moderator approval, and I should have pointed out this issue rather than approving the message.
(3) the gatekeepers would really prefer that submitted patches be sent
to the OpenAFS Request Tracker. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
True, for submitted patches which are intended to be applied to the OpenAFS CVS tree. This, however, was not a submitted patch, and I believe sending it to -bugs would have been premature.
-- Jeff _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
