Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> If the goal is to get the openafs driver accepted into the linux kernel
> (which is something I think should happen), then it's something that
> should be done.  Plenty of people don't even view openafs as a
> distributed filesystem option, since it's not in the kernel; it would be
> nice to get it in there.

I think it's very unlikely that the OpenAFS module will ever be accepted
into the kernel proper for a variety of reasons, one of the big ones being
licensing.  (It's under the IBM Public License, not the GPL.  The IBM
Public License is not GPL-compatible.)

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to