Okay, first of all, the xen people need some polite "education" because haveing 'arch/xen' is just a bad idea. What happens if/when xen/x86_64, or xen/PPC64, or xen/ia64 show up? PPC and PPC64 do just fine with with and without the IBM hypervisor and everything coexists nicely.
The 'xen' arch is not a new processor, and there is no defensible reason I can think of to add another sysname. On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 09:24:37PM -0400, John S. Bucy wrote: > > [moderator: please ignore the other copy that I sent from the wrong addr] > > openafs seems to need some extra support for xen/linux > kernels. See this thread on xen-devel: > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-03/msg00071.html > > I got as far as making up a sysname (i386_xenlinux26) and copying the > configs. I apparently missed something; the build finishes without > error but it never even creates MODLOAD-, etc. > > > > john > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Somone asked my why I work on this free (http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/) software stuff and not get a real job. Charles Shultz had the best answer: "Why do musicians compose symphonies and poets write poems? They do it because life wouldn't have any meaning for them if they didn't. That's why I draw cartoons. It's my life." -- Charles Shultz _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
