Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 02:28:13PM -0400, Ken Hornstein wrote: > >>What's the minimum autoconf version that we are using with OpenAFS? >> >>I ask because in the autoconf glue I did for aklog, I started getting >>complaints because I used AC_ARG_VAR and apparantly some people out >>there (you know who you are) were still using autoconf 2.13, which >>didn't have it. I'm wondering if we can all agree on what the minimum >>autoconf version is and standardize on it with AC_PREREQ (I'm hoping it >>will be something newer than 2.13). I also noticed that the configure >>behavior is different for some macros between 2.13 and later versions >>(specifically, the tests done when doing AC_CHECK_HEADERS seems to be >>more comprehensive in later version of autoconf), and that complicated >>things when I was writing the autoconf tests; that's why I'd like to >>get the autoconf version mess straightened out. > > > FYI, when using Kerberos V5 native tickets, 'user/admin' type principals > don't resolve to 'user.admin' afs ID's, only 'user'. > > Using -524 gets the regular krb5 user.admin ticket, so it works.
That means that 524 is a security hole.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
