Jim Rees wrote:
> I don't think there is any reason.  The original code had H_LOCK until the
> end of CheckHost so it's just paranoia on my part.  H_LOCK after the rpc
> will be the next thing to go if no one can tell me why it's there.

I think it can go.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to