>Perhaps a configure test to see if we find a system com_err and, >if we find it, use it instead of the afs/com_err package?
Maybe we're going about this all wrong. Perhaps we should just include com_err.h instead of afs/com_err.h? I suspect that afs/com_err.h is just ancient cruft. --Ken _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
