chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,William John Murray writes:
Thanks Marc...this fixes the d_child.
marc?
He was probably replying to a message I sent him off-list.
Anyway, this brings me back to my problem of a couple of weeks ago:
libafs: falsely claims to have parameter sys_call_table_addr
on inserting the library...I still have no idea what to do with that.
i guess i would just ignore this. it means that afs couldnt find
the bits it needs for pag support. this broken on later kernels
when the sys_call_table became read only and "unpatchable".
Can't ignore it, since it causes the module load to fail.
Marc
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
