Rainer Toebbicke wrote: > No, I'm afraid that's not sufficient: after dropping and re-acquiring > the locks it may well be that the rxcon_client has changed again. > > Therefore you need the > > while (... && ... && ...) / continue instead of the if (...) construct. > > I came up with the patch from the 1.4.1 base and wasn't aware > of the rxr_CidOf() changes.
I don't believe this is an issue. I do not see a scenario in which rx_SetSpecific(tcon, rxcon_client_key, client) can be called with any value other than 'oldClient' if the 'oldClient' exists and is not deleted. Jeffrey Altman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
