On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Ken Hornstein wrote:

BTW, it's really interesting to peek at the OpenAFS fileserver with
some of the dtrace tools.  It's *very* fdsync happy, and seems to
spend a lot of time/resources syncing buffers to disk -- I wonder if
we could seriously increase performance here and let the OS write-
cache actually be one...

Whew, you ain't kidding.  When I looked at that, I believe a lot of it
was the link table.  I have been idly thinking about simply removing
most of those fsync() calls, or collapsing a whole bunch of them ... it

there's a patch in rt to do it, which i need to look at for 1.5
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to