Hi Russ! On 6 Oct 2006, at 07:00, Russ Allbery wrote:
I've been pondering this a great deal since the AFS Hackathon and since starting to look at what it will take to get the AFS PAM situation fully up to snuff. My conclusion after a fair bit of pondering is that I think it's going to be best to maintain an AFS PAM module that's independent of the OpenAFS tree, but that can use support libraries provided by OpenAFSas needed.
[snip details]
Thoughts?
Yes: That's EXCELLENT! I'd LOVE to contribute, but alas, I'm still not finished with my PhD and the time frames for those two projects overlap approx. 100% :-(
Ciao,
Roland
--
TU Muenchen, Physik-Department E18, James-Franck-Str., 85748 Garching
Telefon 089/289-12575; Telefax 089/289-12570
--
CERN office: 892-1-D23 phone: +41 22 7676540 mobile: +41 76 487 4482
--
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little
security will deserve neither and lose both. - Benjamin Franklin
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GS/CS/M/MU d-(++) s:+ a-> C+++ UL++++ P+++ L+++ E(+) W+ !N K- w--- M
+ !V Y+
PGP++ t+(++) 5 R+ tv-- b+ DI++ e+++>++++ h---- y+++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
