On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Jeffrey Altman wrote: > If you are going to do this. Please make the changes against the CVS > head and work on one module at a time. For example, add prototypes for > all functions in the RX library and fix the code in the other > directories that are affected. Send in that as a patch by itself. > > Please do not send in a patch that adds prototypes in 20 directories > and produces changes in hundreds of files.
Deal. The rxi_getAllAddrMaskMtu() function was absolutely the most complicated example I found. Most of what I was looking at was function declarations. Is the daily snapshot considered the cvs head or should i actually do a crash course on cvs? :) and which patch is used? and where do i submit the patches? Is there an FAQ I missed? I just looked briefly on the wiki.. > The gatekeepers won't be able to review the latter and it won't make it > into the tree. I totally understand. =) And I want it reviewed because my intention is to NOT break anything or even change functionality. Just eliminate some warnings at least for the moment. -------------------------------------- Sean O'Malley, Information Technologist Michigan State University ------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
