On Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:30:21 AM -0400 chas williams - CONTRACTOR
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Jim Rees writes:
I agree, and in fact have already made the fix in cvs. But I've been
around long enough to be skeptical of any fix that has not been tested,
no matter how obviously correct it is.
if your fix is to remove the htons(), that is wrong. you should just
remove the reference to sin_family. people get the impression that
sin_family is actually used if you set it.
On the contrary, it should be set, and correctly, because despite the fact
that the _implementation_ currently doesn't use it, the family is still
part of the interface. It almost certainly will be used in the future,
when we have support for multiple address families.
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
