In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Derr ick J Brashear writes: >> 5.7 >> 5.8 >> 5.9, 5.10 >> 5.5 and anything else (5.6). > >Really, we should rewrite all the rc scripts. But no one's had time.
i suspect the big difference with most of these scripts is the editing of the name_to_sysnum. however, i dont like this 'each release gets a different syscall number'. it would be nice if afs would probe for an empty slot in the syscall table and the userspace utilities would find a use this syscall number. at the very least, the userspace binaries should do this. >It is. As to why not in a separate rc, well, historical. And we won't be >distributing package anymore anyway. it should be moved to obselete. there are better choices out their now (like cfengine) for this type of thing. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
