Jeffrey Hutzelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When we added support for an alternate user/kernel interface on Linux > (via /proc/fs/openafs/afs_ioctl), we did so _very_ slowly, and only > because we were afraid a time would come when it would become impossible > to support the old interface. At present, the old interface is still > supported whenever possible (which is most of the time), and is used > preferentially when available.
For whatever it's worth, having been in a lot of that code recently, I'm fairly sure that the /proc/fs/openafs/afs_ioctl method is used preferentially on Linux and the system call is only done as a fallback. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
