Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
I don't think either of those tools, or various others, really belong in the OpenAFS distribution. OpenAFS should concentrate on being a filesystem, not on incorporating into its distribution every tool someone might want to use with it.
Then where should the afs-utils package be kept? Having the tools kept in one place under source control with a bug tracker can only be good.
That said, in what circumstances are these tools useful? _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
