"Douglas E. Engert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What plan? Is there a plan? All I have seen is this thread on what to > do about K5 principal names with periods, and how this conflicts what > the pts does with multiple part principals and how it uses a K4 style > "." as a separator.
There is a plan, which was developed as part of the rxgk work and I don't think is broken out separately on the roadmap. * the desire to map multiple authentication names to a single AFS ID within the protection database captures it somewhat, but I know there have been further discussions and a somewhat more complete concept design. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
