On 9/19/07, Matt Kolb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > FWIW, I've committed my own time and work towards this method since > > we could also see at least a slight performance increase over current > > code because we're not walking interface lists for every packet. > > > > So, the ioctl method I described, and the worker thread is actually a > > Solaris task queue. See the ddi_taskq_create man page for details on > > that. > > > > So far, my implementation uses Public interfaces. I'm desperately > > trying to keep away from Solaris's, err, Privates. > > Dale, > > Is this something that will go into the maintenance release?
Assuming it doesn't break anything. What's > the best way to track your changes? CVS? Which branch? They hadn't shown up in RT when last I had time to look, so "nowhere in CVS yet" If they're there tonight I will look.
