In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Jeffrey Hutzelman w rites: >There's another issue here, which is that AFS's kernel threads probably >should not be considered part of the contract under which afsd is started. >That is certain to cause all sorts of havoc as SMF tries to kill off the >contract if afsd should die prematurely. I'll leave it somewhat up in the >air whether the right place to fix this is in afsd or in the kernel code.
when i looked at this problem some time ago, i couldnt find a way to drop an association with a contract. i gathered that the right thing to do would be to create a seperate and independent contract for the thread. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
