Isn't most of that information available for unauthenticated users from vos listvol? Why restrict it when using a different command?
<<CDC Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Read makes sense. The FS - CM Programmer's Reference doesn't specify > what the privileges should be so I would go with the code. > > Please file a bug report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you are > really nice you will include a patch to the man pages. > > Jeffrey Altman > > > Andrew Deason wrote: >> The documentation for several commands: >> >> - fs diskfree >> - fs examine >> - fs listquota >> - fs quota >> >> says that the required privilege for successfully executing these is >> "l", even as far back as the IBM documentation. However, all of these >> use the GetVolumeStatus RPC, which requires PRSFS_READ, even as far >> back as IBM AFS as far as I can tell (src/viced/afsfileprocs.c >> SRXAFS_GetVolumeStatus). >> >> Which should it be, r or l? I don't really imagine either way causing >> problems, but the documentation and code should be consistent, >> shirley. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
