Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote:
So, what I'd think would be best is if most of the current afsd code
would be moved out into some library (I have no idea if any of the
current ones make sense, or if an entirely new one should be created),
that both afsd and libuafs can use. A usermode client could then just
be an entirely separate standalone program, that just calls libuafs
stuff.
Thoughts? Am I making sense?
This sounds like a good idea to me, not that I actually do any real
development though.
<<CDC
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel