Last week, I posted a patch to RT #124627, only to notice this morning that I'd been testing with a large-ish cache. Also, there appears to be some regression in my own fiddlings, as #124627 isn't solved at all. For what it's worth, the deadlock as reported in #120491 is apparently prevented, although mmap_test still gets blocked in some I/O-wait state.
Cache consistency with mmap'ed writes can apparently only be achieved when no afs_linux_writepage_sync's are aborted at all. I think I still haven't truly understood the exact idea of the antirecursion patch. To me, it seems to omit writing some precious data. Regards - Felix _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
